CrucialCT240M500SSD1
CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2013.

 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,584 user samples
12,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% 94GB free
Worst Bench: 51% 51GB free (System drive)
Poor: 51% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 397th / 956
7,130 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% 133GB free (System drive)
Worst Bench: 68% 87GB free (System drive)
Poor: 68% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 161st / 956
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
74.7 % 94.4 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
404 MB/s 426 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+5%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
255 MB/s 412 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+62%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
22.2 MB/s 27.6 MB/s Faster random read.
+24%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
82.6 MB/s 90.2 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+9%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
286 MB/s 336 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+17%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
31.2 MB/s 39.3 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+26%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
179 MB/s 342 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+91%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
442 MB/s 470 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+6%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
275 MB/s 467 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+70%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
27.1 MB/s 33.3 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+23%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
123 MB/s 125 MB/s +2%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
309 MB/s 380 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+23%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39.6 MB/s 48.8 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+23%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
266 MB/s 444 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+67%
Market Share
Based on 7,977,448 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % Hugely higher market share.
+190%
0.1 %
Value
Value For Money
82.3 % Slightly better value.
+13%
72.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
62 % 66 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$80 Much cheaper.
+40%
$134
Age
Newest
65 Months 43 Months Much more recent.
+34%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
330 MB/s 378 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue read.
+15%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
264 MB/s 358 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+36%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,022 Pts 1,234 Pts Stronger server IO.
+21%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
188 MB/s 256 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+36%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
284 MB/s 305 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue read.
+7%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
243 MB/s 291 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+20%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
159 MB/s 209 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+31%
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 250GB
ADVERTISEMENT

We had high expectations for the Crucial M500. Crucial have a long history of producing outstanding Solid State drives. Both the RealSSD 300 and the M4, three and two years old, were almost legendary in terms of reliability and performance. The M500 falls far short of our expectations. The drive is relatively cheap and as such we were expecting to compromise on performance but the M500 just falls too far short. With a Real World Performance of 377.5 MBps which is in the bottom 40% and an AS-SSD score of 901 points (50th percentile) the M500 demonstrates relatively weak real world and average server performance. The M500 is competing with the Sandisk Ultra which manages to squeeze out significantly more performance despite sitting in the same price bracket. [Jun '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2018 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback