Controller: Phison PS3110. NAND Memory: Toshiba A19 MLC

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 13,610 user samples
8,764 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 165GB free
Worst Bench: 61% 73GB free
Poor: 61% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 137th / 859
4,846 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 102% 66GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 22GB free
Poor: 57% Great: 102%
SPEED RANK: 153rd / 859
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
84 % +1% 83 % -1%
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
498 MB/s -0% 500 MB/s +0%
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
453 MB/s Faster write speed.
362 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
25.9 MB/s -3% 26.7 MB/s +3%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
75.1 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
71.5 MB/s -5%
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
459 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
369 MB/s -24%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
12.9 MB/s -88% 24.2 MB/s Hugely faster random mixed IO.
Peak Sequential Read Speed
527 MB/s 0% 527 MB/s 0%
Peak Sequential Write Speed
509 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
399 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32.1 MB/s -3% 33 MB/s +3%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
115 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
103 MB/s -12%
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
512 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
416 MB/s -23%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
14.1 MB/s -144% 34.4 MB/s Hugely faster peak random mixed IO.
Market Share
Based on 3,862,640 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.42 % Much higher market share.
0.3 % -40%
Value For Money
70.4 % Better value.
57.1 % -23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
65 % -3% 67 % +3%
Price (score)
$115 Cheaper.
$156 -26%
29 Months Slightly more recent.
32 Months -9%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
352 MB/s -2% 358 MB/s +2%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
349 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
278 MB/s -26%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,185 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
1,097 Pts -8%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
62.6 MB/s -7% 66.8 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
190 MB/s +2% 187 MB/s -2%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
216 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
178 MB/s -21%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
22.2 MB/s -90% 42.1 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
240GB 250GB

The 240GB Kingston HyperX Savage sports a Phison PS3110 controller. This marks a welcome departure from Kingston's use of Sandforce 2281 controllers and for the first time in years gives Kinston a shot at competing in the enthusiast/performance segment of the SSD market. Comparing the HyperX Savage and Fury shows that the new Phision controller has an effective speed that is around 40% faster than the Sandforce based Fury. But then comparing the similarly priced OCZ Vertex 460a and Savage shows that, although the overall effective speeds are similar, the Vertex has three times faster 4K Mixed IO speeds. The HyperX Savage is very good for typical consumer use but power users with more demanding I/O loads should probably look elsewhere. [Jun '15 SSDrivePro]


The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]


Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2017 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our consumer SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed based on real world performance then adjust by cost per GB to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. Share your opinion by voting. [SSDrivePro]

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback