Controller: Phison PS3110. NAND Memory: Toshiba A19 MLC

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187. Memory: SanDisk 19nm TLC.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 16,591 user samples
7,939 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% 200GB free
Worst Bench: 58% 83GB free
Poor: 58% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 857
8,652 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% 122GB free
Worst Bench: 47% 44GB free
Poor: 47% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 407th / 857
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
82.7 % Faster effective speed.
66 % -25%
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
493 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
457 MB/s -8%
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
449 MB/s Hugely faster write speed.
246 MB/s -83%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
25.3 MB/s -11% 28.1 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
74.2 MB/s Much faster random write.
51.5 MB/s -44%
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
460 MB/s Hugely faster mixed IO speed.
242 MB/s -90%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
12.6 MB/s -16% 14.6 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
Peak Sequential Read Speed
525 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
498 MB/s -5%
Peak Sequential Write Speed
509 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
339 MB/s -50%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32.1 MB/s -19% 38.3 MB/s Faster peak random read.
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
112 MB/s Much faster peak random write.
82.4 MB/s -36%
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
512 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
324 MB/s -58%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
14.1 MB/s -50% 21.1 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
Market Share
Based on 3,517,083 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.41 % -63% 0.67 % Much higher market share.
Value For Money
67.2 % -3% 69.5 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % +5% 63 % -5%
Price (score)
$120 -29% $85 Cheaper.
28 Months More recent.
35 Months -20%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
354 MB/s -2% 360 MB/s +2%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
344 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
209 MB/s -65%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,180 Pts Stronger server IO.
1,009 Pts -17%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
62.4 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
51.2 MB/s -22%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
183 MB/s +2% 180 MB/s -2%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
209 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
133 MB/s -57%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
21.4 MB/s -42% 30.3 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
240GB 240GB

The 240GB Kingston HyperX Savage sports a Phison PS3110 controller. This marks a welcome departure from Kingston's use of Sandforce 2281 controllers and for the first time in years gives Kinston a shot at competing in the enthusiast/performance segment of the SSD market. Comparing the HyperX Savage and Fury shows that the new Phision controller has an effective speed that is around 40% faster than the Sandforce based Fury. But then comparing the similarly priced OCZ Vertex 460a and Savage shows that, although the overall effective speeds are similar, the Vertex has three times faster 4K Mixed IO speeds. The HyperX Savage is very good for typical consumer use but power users with more demanding I/O loads should probably look elsewhere. [Jun '15 SSDrivePro]


The Sandisk Ultra II sits above Sandisk's Ultra Plus and below their Extreme Pro. The Ultra Plus would probably have been phased out completely were it not for its continued success within budget space. The Ultra II is the first Sandisk drive to utilize cheaper (and slower) TLC NAND. Similarly to the Extreme Pro, the Ultra II utilizes an nCache which operates a portion of the NAND in simulated SLC mode. This strategy also matches the one employed by Samsung's now 14 months old Evo. Comparing the Ultra II and Evo shows broad performance equivalence which given the Ultra II's 15% price discount makes it the better choice today. That said it's probably worth waiting for the release of the 850 Evo which will pack another 14 months of Samsung's market leading R&D and will probably steal the show. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]


Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our consumer SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed based on real world performance then adjust by cost per GB to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. Share your opinion by voting. [SSDrivePro]

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $133
Intel Core i5-7600K $212Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $271Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback