Controller: Samsung 3-core MDX. Flash Memory: Samsung 21nm Toggle Mode MLC.

Controller: OCZ Barefoot 3 M00. Flash: Toshiba 19nm (1st gen) MLC NAND.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 7,034 user samples
6,637 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% 179GB free
Worst Bench: 52% 9GB free
Worst: 52% Best: 107%
SPEED RANK: 122nd / 798
397 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% 176GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 71GB free
Worst: 64% Best: 114%
SPEED RANK: 54th / 798
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
82.5 % -9% 89.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
485 MB/s -1% 490 MB/s +1%
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
345 MB/s -32% 454 MB/s Much faster write speed.
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
28.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
21.6 MB/s -33%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
77.5 MB/s -14% 88.4 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
377 MB/s -24% 468 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
21.8 MB/s -17% 25.6 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
Peak Sequential Read Speed
522 MB/s 0% 522 MB/s 0%
Peak Sequential Write Speed
493 MB/s -2% 503 MB/s +2%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
36.3 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
27 MB/s -34%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
115 MB/s -24% 143 MB/s Faster peak random write.
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
508 MB/s -0% 509 MB/s +0%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
28.3 MB/s -37% 38.9 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
Market Share
Based on 1,280,254 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.8 % Insanely higher market share.
0 % -∞%
Value For Money
44.1 % -67% 73.4 % Much better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
61 % 0% 61 % 0%
Price (score)
$224 -47% $119 Much cheaper.
47 Months -28% 34 Months More recent.
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
374 MB/s +2% 365 MB/s -2%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
316 MB/s -11% 351 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,191 Pts -3% 1,223 Pts +3%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
90.1 MB/s -11% 100 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
207 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue read.
187 MB/s -11%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
190 MB/s -6% 202 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
55.1 MB/s -10% 60.8 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue mixed IO.
256GB 240GB

The 840 Pro is stunning. Samsung have created a completely in-house package including both the controller and their own new 21nm toggle mode NAND. On release (Oct '12) this was the fastest performing deep queue depth consumer grade SSD available. Fast forward six months (Apr '13) and the 840 Pro still holds both the random read/write deep queue depth speed records of 384 MB/s and 326 MB/s, impressive considering how fast the SSD space tends to move. There are no obvious weaknesses, in-fact the 840 pro takes first place in nearly all of the speed categories and is only seriously rivalled by one drive, the OCZ Vector. To conclude, in terms of both outright performance, particularly server orientated, and value for money the 256GB and 128GB 840 Pros are amongst the top handful of drives currently available. [Jun '13 SSDrivePro]


Comparing the 150 to the original Vector is disappointing, the newer 150 actually offers marginally worse performance than its predecessor. A strange result but verified (at least partly) by figures on OCZ's own website: 100K 4K read IOPS for the Vector vs 90K 4K read IOPS for the 150. The newer 150 comes with a 5 year warranty which covers 50GB/day vs. the original Vectors 20GB/day but even this should be taken with a pinch of salt considering that the OCZ stock price is currently trading at around seven cents per share, an all time low. Despite the fact that new Vector 150 performs worse than its predecessor it's still a very competent performer and if prices drop, it has the potential to become a decent value proposition. In the meantime however there are far better deals available elsewhere.  [Dec '13 SSDrivePro]


Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2016 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our consumer SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed based on real world performance then adjust by cost per GB to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. Share your opinion by voting. [SSDrivePro]

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: DX9 and DX10 3D performance.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Share page
The Best.
Intel Core i7-6700K $308Nvidia GTX 970 $256Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
Intel Core i5-6600K $237Nvidia GTX 980 Ti $474Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i7-4790K $335AMD RX 480 $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
WD Black 1TB (2013) $69G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $459SanDisk Extreme 64GB $32
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $20
WD Black 2TB (2013) $105Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $16
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback