Controller: Samsung Dual Core MGX. Memory: Samsung 40nm TLC V-NAND

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,066 user samples
133,851 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% 117GB free
Worst Bench: 68% 63GB free
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 853
4,215 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 102% 97GB free
Worst Bench: 61% 184GB free
Poor: 61% Great: 102%
SPEED RANK: 147th / 853
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
95 % Slightly faster effective speed.
83 % -14%
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
499 MB/s -1% 504 MB/s +1%
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
390 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
367 MB/s -6%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
37.8 MB/s Much faster random read.
27 MB/s -40%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
77.5 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
71.8 MB/s -8%
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
395 MB/s Slightly faster mixed IO speed.
372 MB/s -6%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.2 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
23.8 MB/s -39%
Peak Sequential Read Speed
517 MB/s -2% 528 MB/s +2%
Peak Sequential Write Speed
416 MB/s +4% 399 MB/s -4%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
47.3 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
32.9 MB/s -44%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
109 MB/s +5% 104 MB/s -5%
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
422 MB/s +1% 416 MB/s -1%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
48.3 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
34.3 MB/s -41%
Market Share
Based on 3,088,444 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
9.53 % Insanely higher market share.
0.35 % -2,623%
Value For Money
91.2 % Much better value.
57.1 % -60%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % Much more popular.
67 % -69%
Price (score)
$100 Much cheaper.
$156 -36%
30 Months -3% 29 Months +3%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
378 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue read.
357 MB/s -6%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
284 MB/s +3% 275 MB/s -3%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,169 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
1,093 Pts -7%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
118 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
66.6 MB/s -77%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
198 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
172 MB/s -15%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
190 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
171 MB/s -11%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
67.6 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
40.4 MB/s -67%
250GB 250GB

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]


The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]


Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our consumer SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed based on real world performance then adjust by cost per GB to yield a value for money rating. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. Share your opinion by voting. [SSDrivePro]

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $225Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback