SamsungMZ-76P256BW
OCZARC100-25SAT3-240G
$120

Controller: Samsung MJX. Memory: Samsung 64 layer MLC V-NAND. Release date: Q1 2018.

 $120 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3. Flash Memory: Toshiba A19nm MLC. Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 24,364 user samples
12,565 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% 228GB free
Worst Bench: 78% 69GB free (System drive)
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 220th / 1072
11,799 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 139GB free
Worst Bench: 65% 82GB free
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 370th / 1072
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
109 % Faster effective speed.
+25%
87 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
474 MB/s Much faster read speed.
+31%
363 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
419 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+5%
398 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
37.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
+62%
23.3 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
93.3 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+7%
87.4 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
398 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+32%
301 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
48.3 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+45%
33.2 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
388 MB/s Slightly faster sustained write speed.
+10%
354 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
515 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+26%
410 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
488 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
+15%
426 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
45.9 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+68%
27.3 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
128 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+6%
121 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
448 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+39%
323 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
61 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+56%
39 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
487 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+19%
410 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 75,637,971 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
15.5 % Much better value.
+63%
9.51 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$90 Cheaper.
+25%
$120
Age
Newest
74 Months Much more recent.
+36%
116 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
389 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+23%
317 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
361 MB/s +3% 352 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1289 Pts Stronger server IO.
+16%
1108 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
367 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+42%
258 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
343 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+24%
277 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
296 MB/s +1% 294 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
309 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+37%
226 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
256GB 240GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The 860 Pro is Samsung’s latest consumer-grade SATA SSD flagship, superseding the popular, but now three years old, 850 Pro. Like the 850 Pro, the 860 Pro is based on Samsung’s proprietary and revolutionary (at the time), MLC V-NAND (3D). A 10% price premium over the 256 GB 850 Pro will purchase the 256 GB 860 Pro which has an impressive 16% faster effective speed. This is achieved via an updated controller (MJX) and 64 layers of V-NAND (versus 32 layers per the 850 Pro). The 860 Pro has sequential speeds of up to 540 MB/s which almost completely saturate its SATA 3.0 interface. These peak levels of performance are slightly higher, but still comparable to the peak performance of the 860 Evo before its SLC write cache (12 GB on the 250 GB Evo) is saturated, making the 860 Evo (at around 30% cheaper) a more economical choice for users who rarely write more than 12 GB at a time. There are also reliability improvements compared to the 850 generation with Samsung now offering a warranty of 300 TBW (terabytes written) for the 256 GB 860 Pro, compared to 150 TBW for the 256 GB 850 Pro. Thanks to higher density NAND, the 860 Pro is also available in a 4 TB variant, whereas previously 2 TB was the largest capacity for a Samsung SATA MLC SSD.  [Feb '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 240GB OCZ ARC has a solid performance profile with particularly strong 4K speeds. The ARC is positioned below both OCZ's enthusiast Vector 150 and the mainstream Vertex 460 but based on hardware specs there is very little separating the drives (newer NAND on the ARC). Comparing the Vertex 460 and ARC shows that the ARC lags particularly in terms of sequential write speed but the overall difference in effective speed is marginal. The broad performance equivalence coupled with the fact that the Vertex 460 is available at the same price point makes the 240GB ARC somewhat redundant for the time being. Given that the ARC is relatively new, prices are likely to drop significantly over the coming months at which point the ARC may make more sense. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback