UserBenchmark: Kingston HyperX 3K vs Transcend SSD370

SSD
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR SSD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

TranscendTS256GSSD370

BUY • $110

KingstonSH103S3/240G

BUY • $70

BenchYourSSD

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 32,744 user samples

Benchmark your SSD here

5,249 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 96% 139GB free
Worst Bench: 54% 14GB free (System drive)

Poor: 54% Great: 96%

SPEED RANK: 487^th / 1072

27,495 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)

Poor: 59% Great: 94%

SPEED RANK: 477^th / 1072


Effective Speed Effective SSD Speed		80 %			80.6 %	+1%


Read Avg. Sequential Read Speed	465 MB/s	Faster read speed. +24%	375 MB/s
Write Avg. Sequential Write Speed	283 MB/s	Faster write speed. +16%	243 MB/s
4K Read Avg. 4K Random Read Speed	24.5 MB/s		31.2 MB/s	Faster random read. +27%
4K Write Avg. 4K Random Write Speed	73.3 MB/s		82.3 MB/s	Faster random write. +12%
Mixed Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed	251 MB/s		274 MB/s	Slightly faster mixed IO speed. +9%
4K Mixed Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed	33.2 MB/s		40.2 MB/s	Faster random mixed IO. +21%
SusWrite Avg. Sustained Write Speed	231 MB/s	Faster sustained write speed. +26%	183 MB/s


Read Peak Sequential Read Speed	513 MB/s	Faster peak read speed. +16%	442 MB/s
Write Peak Sequential Write Speed	301 MB/s	Slightly faster peak write speed. +7%	281 MB/s
4K Read Peak 4K Random Read Speed	29 MB/s		37.8 MB/s	Much faster peak random read. +30%
4K Write Peak 4K Random Write Speed	108 MB/s		112 MB/s	+4%
Mixed Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed	296 MB/s		312 MB/s	Slightly faster peak mixed IO speed. +5%
4K Mixed Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed	41.3 MB/s		49.6 MB/s	Faster peak random mixed IO. +20%
SusWrite Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average	295 MB/s	Much faster peak sustained write speed. +33%	221 MB/s

Market Share

Based on 75,657,700 SSDs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0 %	0.02 %	Insanely higher market share. +∞%
Value Value For Money	9.8 %	13.2 %	Much better value. +35%
User Rating UBM User Rating	53 %	53 %
Price Price (score)	$110	$70	Much cheaper. +36%


Age Newest	116 Months	More recent. +19%	144 Months
DQ Read Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed	291 MB/s		298 MB/s	+2%
DQ Write Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed	288 MB/s	Slightly faster peak deep queue write. +9%	264 MB/s
AS-SSD Total AS-SSD Total Score	987 Pts	+0%	985 Pts
DQ Mixed Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed	193 MB/s		289 MB/s	Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO. +50%
ADQ Read Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed	255 MB/s		258 MB/s	+1%
ADQ Write Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed	246 MB/s	Faster deep queue write. +18%	209 MB/s
ADQ Mixed Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed	161 MB/s		223 MB/s	Much faster deep queue mixed IO. +39%


Capacity Capacity			256GB			240GB

The 256GB Transcend SSD370 sports a Silicon Motion (SM2246EN) controller coupled with Micron 20nm synchronous MLC NAND. With peak sequential read/write speeds of 520/290 MBps and peak 4k read/write speeds of 29/116 the SSD370 has an effective speed which is amongst the bottom 25% of ~250GB drives. The effective speed is weighed down by a relatively weak sequential write speed of just 290 MBps. The performance highlight for the SSD370 is its ability to deal with mixed 4k IO which is arguably one of the best real world indicators. At current prices the SSD370 can't compete as there are both cheaper and faster alternatives on the market but prices are almost certain to drop at which time the SSD370 will fare far better in terms of value. ^{[Oct '14 SSDrivePro]}

MORE DETAILS

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. ^{[Jan '14 SSDrivePro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these SSDs

Top Builds that include these SSDs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. ^[SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ

What is sustained sequential write speed?

What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?

What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?

What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?

What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?

What is sequential write speed?

What is sequential read speed?

What is incompressible data?

What is queue depth?

Solid State Drives

What is the SSD value for money rating?

What is 4K 64 thread write speed?

Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?

What is the effective SSD speed index?

How is the AS SSD write score calculated?

How is the AS SSD read score calculated?

How is the AS SSD total score calculated?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback