Average Bench: 63% (603rd of 956)

Based on 12,215 user benchmarks.  Models: SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series, SAMSUNG SSD PM830 2.5" 7, SAMSUNG SSD 830, SAMSUNG SSD 830 Seri

The 128GB Samsung 830 is nearly two and a half years old which puts it at a significant disadvantage to more recent models. With peak and average sequential read/write speeds of 512/323 and 410/239 MB/s it's not too shabby, especially considering its age. The sequential figures actually match the current group leaders. The small file 4K peak and average read/write speeds of 22.5/60.3 and 17/40 MB/s are not as impressive and lag the group leaders by 50%. Reduced small file performance weighs on the 128GB 830's effective speed which is 376 MB/s and 20% lower than the average of 453 MB/s for the highest voted group leaders. Finally comparing the 128 and 256GB versions shows that the larger drive has a superior performance profile, which is not uncommon for SSDs but newer models from Samsung don't share this trait. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]


Above average average bench

The Samsung 830 128GB averaged 36.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 106MB/s
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed 253MB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung 830 128GB is 29.9%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung 830 128GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed 70.9MB/s
Avg. Sustained Write Speed 204MB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 12,215 samples)
Min Avg Max
335 Read 431 492
144 Write 234 313
144 Mixed 224 288
92 SusWrite 204 308
60.7% 273 MB/s
Min Avg Max
15.9 4K Read 20.4 24.3
34.5 4K Write 51.3 66
16.1 4K Mixed 21.6 25.9
85.8% 31.1 MB/s
Min Avg Max
23.4 DQ Read 253 296
45.2 DQ Write 70.9 86.7
23.4 DQ Mixed 106 134
92.8% 143 MB/s
User Benchmarks Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
The fastest SSD (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 202 225 256 241 MB/s
Read 442
Write 233
Mixed 241
SusWrite 216
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 25
98% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 120
105% 162 MB/s
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 178 188 179 195 192 MB/s
Read 432
Write 183
Mixed 202
SusWrite 183
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 22.5
88% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 109
98% 155 MB/s
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM01B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 224 239 224 235 247 MB/s
Read 421
Write 270
Mixed 222
SusWrite 231
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 17.6
69% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 117
93% 134 MB/s
12,215 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 8,643,197 SSDs tested.

Typical 830 128GB Builds (Compare 11,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 59%
Desktop 61%
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $956

Popular 830 128GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Controller: Samsung 3-core MCX. NAND: Samsung 27nm Toggle Mode MLC

Rest easy with reliable in-house Samsung engineering...

Added 4 years ago.

Very poor

4 years ago.

956 Drives (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different SSDs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $349Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $139SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback