PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z77-DS3H (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131113 |
Uptime | 10 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '18 at 19:20 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia(10DE 1407) 2GB
CLim: 1240 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 168 74 127 103 103 MB/s
|
68.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
107GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 75 76 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 506x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 371x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 279x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 140x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 120x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 104x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $560 |