Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '18 at 23:42
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 76.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 244 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 927 83% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,329 82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6678) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 137 Parallax 117 110% 129 fps	MRender 96.5 Gravity 125 Splatting 104 89% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 147 143 139 139 138 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 464 Write 345 Mixed 320 SusWrite 147 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40 147% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 252 192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 95%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 55GB free Firmware: UG3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 85 170 145 72 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 403 Write 230 Mixed 130 SusWrite 121 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 15.9 77% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 3.5 DQ Mixed 12.9 20% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 192 194 193 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 154 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 192 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 606GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 125 125 126 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 164 Write 150 Mixed 101 SusWrite 125 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 109%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 2,149 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 14 14 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.32% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 9.7 Mixed 16 SusWrite 14.8 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 72% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.32% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 5,589 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 31.6 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 26.2 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 88 45% 88 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)