Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
5 days ago, 3 days ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 01:39
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500-$134
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61% Good
SC Int 85.3
SC Float 79.8
SC Mixed 85.8
67% 83.6 Pts
QC Int 298
QC Float 319
QC Mixed 313
70% 310 Pts
MC Int 261
MC Float 279
MC Mixed 328
43% 289 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$210
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1029 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 146
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 192
50% 141 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 142
Splatting 95.2
44% 101 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$95
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 300 290 294 286 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 392
Write 358
Mixed 304
SusWrite 289
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 31.5
118% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 58
50% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 73%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 180 181 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 30
SusWrite 180
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
150GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 80
Write 41.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 83.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 6 7.1 8 9 8.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6.9
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.6
135% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $551
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $172SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $191SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback