Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 01:39
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 168
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 244
40% 282 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1029 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 32
Parallax 60
40% 46.9 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 41.4
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 300 290 294 286 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 392
Write 358
Mixed 304
SusWrite 289
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 31.5
118% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 58
50% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 180 181 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 30
SusWrite 180
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
150GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 80
Write 41.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 83.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 6 7.1 8 9 8.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6.9
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.6
135% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $776
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback