Lenovo 80KU

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80KU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Polo
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '18 at 20:48
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Memory 20.6 1-Core 19.4 2-Core 20.8 14% 20.3 Pts	4-Core 28 8-Core 27.8 4% 27.9 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3903) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 2.31 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SL2-120 120GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 34 65 35 107 56 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.1% Poor	Read 244 Write 228 Mixed 185 SusWrite 61.5 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 5.7 30% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 58.9 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 17.3 26% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 3.4 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 4.3 10% 9.68 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB 3,854 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 0.8 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 317 13% 317 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80KU Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 11%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80KU

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	1x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 18%, 3,854 samples	1x
M471B5174BM0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 897 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 80KU

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 80KU

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)