IT P95xER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 63% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIT P95xER  (all builds)
MotherboardIT P95xER
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 07:27
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 92.8
42% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 294
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 95E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6025
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.69
6% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 693 349 453 438 521 513 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,640
Write 998
Mixed 812
SusWrite 495
219% 986 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 27.2
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 176
161% 250 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 141%
Great: 293%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 331 384 366 358 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 402
Write 341
Mixed 316
SusWrite 366
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 28.9
89% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 266
200% 267 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905703-009.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P95xER Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: IT P95xER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback