Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '18 at 16:11
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 323 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 3002) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Lighting 12.4 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 15.1 10% 13.6 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 14.4 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 96 93 84 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 155 Write 116 Mixed 129 SusWrite 92.8 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 26.5 89% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 106 85% 120 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 343GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 145 146 141 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 96 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 144 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 9.4 10 10 9.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.77% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 9 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 9.8 14% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.77% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	85x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16