PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170920 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '18 at 17:05 |
Run Duration | 257 Seconds |
Run User | TWN-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Titan V
Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 549 656 657 662 651 MB/s
|
129%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 211 211 212 209 MB/s
|
79.8%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
2TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 203 211 211 212 209 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 211 211 212 209 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 133 130 103 134 134 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 211 213 212 212 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
118%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 296x |
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples | 246x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 180x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 175x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 62x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $1,578 |