Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170921
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '18 at 13:09
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 202 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 394 43% 339 Pts	64-Core 248 15% 248 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 6.73 Parallax 6.25 4% 5.74 fps	MRender 7.81 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 8.57 7% 8.06 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 459 458 469 472 464 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 485 Mixed 348 SusWrite 460 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 62.5 210% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 351 264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 168 167 168 168 168 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 165 Mixed 102 SusWrite 166 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 11.8 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	323x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	138x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	22x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 81%, 93,353 samples	16x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $794

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16