| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 06 '18 at 08:47 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.5%
Above average
|
50% 73.3 Pts
|
17% 131 Pts
|
9% 146 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.03%
Terrible
|
1% 1.23 fps
|
1% 1.54 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 38 39 36 30 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
22% 29.5 MB/s
|
39% 0.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.4%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 483x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 203x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 140x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 392x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 97x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |