Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 21:09
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 140
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 393
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 51.8
Parallax 61.4
38% 53.4 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 37
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 226 226 201 201 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 59.7
Write 258
Mixed 312
SusWrite 214
49% 211 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 31.2
108% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 68.3
103% 194 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
174GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 367 368 370 347 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 423
Write 384
Mixed 378
SusWrite 349
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 198
155% 214 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 125%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
72GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 98 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 100
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback