| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP EliteBook 2570p (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 17DF |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130201 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 08 '18 at 22:26 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | PRI-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.2%
Average
|
34% 49 Pts
|
18% 154 Pts
|
13% 210 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
|
2.2%
Terrible
|
2% 2.43 fps
|
3% 3.05 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 21 26 20 20 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
15% 19.6 MB/s
|
26% 0.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.2%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
36% 111 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 2570p Builds (Compare 456 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 2570p
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples | 149x |
| Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples | 99x |
| Core i5-3360MIntel $594Bench 54%, 5,754 samples | 64x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 451x |
| GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples | 3x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |