PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P6T SE (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100921 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 00:31 |
Run Duration | 236 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 101 103 105 107 MB/s
|
64.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
148GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 102 102 105 106 107 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
728GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 111 111 114 115 MB/s
|
55.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 160 161 168 169 172 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
759GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 156 155 164 164 168 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
944GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 128 123 124 126 MB/s
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
19GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 8.8 9 8.8 9.6 10 MB/s
|
7.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 507x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 225x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 190x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 101x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 70x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 55x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |