Asrock H55 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H55 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101231
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 06 '16 at 23:16
Run Duration	323 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 68 2-Core 108 48% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 173 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7750 22,655 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E245) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	8.88% Terrible	Lighting 9.97 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 13.4 8% 12.3 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 8.9 Splatting 16.1 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88 2,082 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN423b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3300 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 834 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 4296146944 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 192 192 468163166256 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 224 (C2) HDA temperature 58 58 193276215338 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 27041993984 (EA) Unknown 100 100 65645814144 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7518486192 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10673064267	44.8% Average	Read 176 Write 156 Mixed 158 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 16.9 87% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 17.9 24% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 107GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2208 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1931 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3009 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 701 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 175 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1755 (C2) HDA temperature 108 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.4% Very good	Read 140 Write 130 Mixed 101 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.16 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.32 103% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 109%
Adata DashDrive UV150 USB 3.0 16GB-$39 1,302 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4GB free, PID dc1a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 28 Write 8.86 Mixed 2.52 12% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.16 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.09 25% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock H55 Extreme3

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)