Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 227 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 392 57% 415 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 36C7) CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 30 Parallax 27.9 28% 30.6 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 29.9 Splatting 30.2 21% 24.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon S920 128-N9 128GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC70106 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 281 Write 246 Mixed 217 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 22.5 79% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 70.6 90% 159 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 817GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 89 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 92 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 91.2 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 1x16GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.8 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 10.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16