Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 13:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 96.5
46% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 207
22% 178 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 64.6
38% 53.2 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 71.5
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A240G 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 106 98 72 49 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 232
Write 145
Mixed 129
SusWrite 77
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 14.2
49% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 122
97% 133 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 77%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40
67GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 88 90 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 88.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 87.5
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback