Asus Z170-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-E  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160627
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 23:13
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 247
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 664
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 66.4
61% 72.6 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 72
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871a M.2 2280 512GB SED
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV22D6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 408 376 382 382 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 399
Mixed 344
SusWrite 392
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 45.6
148% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 119 117 112 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 444
Write 426
Mixed 365
SusWrite 148
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 42.3
150% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 351
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 124%
Avant 480GB Client SSD 480GB
118GB free
Firmware: O1026A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 422 420 414 414 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 428
Write 386
Mixed 318
SusWrite 418
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 29.1
117% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 203
167% 238 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 173 173 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 158
Mixed 94
SusWrite 173
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
442GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 194 194 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 194
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 19.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-E Builds (Compare 1,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $455
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback