Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 20:03
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 197
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 492
52% 416 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 194
Parallax 195
144% 188 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 179
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 143 141 132 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 426
Write 138
Mixed 130
SusWrite 139
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 21
100% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 64
94% 182 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
275GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 71 73 79 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 67.3
Write 74.2
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 71.7
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 103 101 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 107
Write 107
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 104
126% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $685
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback