Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '16 at 14:44
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 139 57% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 233 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% EVGA(3842 2650) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.93% Terrible	Lighting 10.3 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 11.3 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 13.1 10% 12 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.93% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ INTREPID 3700 240GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 53 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 24 (64) Unknown 100 100 67552 (AB) Unknown 79 0 2712 (AE) Unknown 50 100 12 (B8) Unknown 20 100 680 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 55 3610929 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 100 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 119 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 27744865 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 0 100 4 (D0) Spin buzz 0 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (D5) Unknown 100 100 0 (D6) Unknown 100 100 0 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 0 100 (F9) Unknown 100 100 195 (FB) Unknown 100 100 114	70.8% Very good	Read 466 Write 203 Mixed 288 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 23 118% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 81.1 69% 96 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 3TB 672 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 144 Write 149 Mixed 156 113% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.21 79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 111%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299 4,054 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 438GB free Firmware: GS001C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5264 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 70 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 8489 (0A) Spinup retry count 205 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5250 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 9 9 91 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 40 572194850 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 421410 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7667829 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 31210 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	47.2% Average	Read 81.7 Write 82.8 Mixed 72.2 59% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.28 75% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 48%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 793GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 99 Write 100 Mixed 57.8 106% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.21 67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB 665 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 13.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	26x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	3x
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 197 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16