Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 28 '16 at 13:23
Run Duration519 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 110
53% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 329
34% 275 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
XFX(1682 3130) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 27.6
23% 26.7 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 30.1
22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 373
Write 220
Mixed 174
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 15.4
93% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 15.7
21% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 114%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
143GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 87.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 66.1
61% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 2.65
4K Mixed 0.28
128% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 93%
TOSHIBA MK5075GSX 500GB
254GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 29
Mixed 13.3
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-16000CL7-2GBFLS F3-16000CL7-2GBFLS CT102464BA160B.M16 CT102464BA160B.M16 20GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback