HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '16 at 07:55
Run Duration	721 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 500 56% 439 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 0936) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.09 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.91 4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 196GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 175 2066 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13644 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 690 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 63 538574880 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13575 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.9% Very good	Read 157 Write 111 Mixed 71.7 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.25 91% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 8910 (03) Spinup time 144 143 3783 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 695 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 24932 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 682 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 8910 (BC) Unknown 100 75 998 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 606142499 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 73 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 781 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.7% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 82.6 Mixed 21.5 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 69%
ADATA HV620 2TB 747 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 754GB free, PID a31a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 22 95% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.21 63% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 47%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 561GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 24.6 Mixed 23 33% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.24 72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 246GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 15.3 Write 69.6 Mixed 61.2 74% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.14 16% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 43%
Seagate Portable 1TB 1,255 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 123GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.5 Mixed 5.86 32% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.15 17% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer U 16GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 9GB free, PID 55a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	7.95% Terrible	Read 21 Write 3.59 Mixed 6.21 10% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.82 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.89 80% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 12%
hp v210w 16GB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 5607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.55% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 3.76 Mixed 6.77 12% 13 MB/s	4K Read 6.69 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 2x4GB 510 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 15.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	907x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	285x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	204x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	416x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	129x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16