| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130225 |
| Uptime | 3.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 01 '16 at 16:36 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.2%
Very good
|
70% 121 Pts
|
45% 340 Pts
|
21% 345 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
EVGA(3842 3652) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
17% 20.6 fps
|
16% 20 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.2%
Poor
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 331 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 89x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 25x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 24x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $368 |