HP Compaq 6735s

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6735s (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30E4
Memory	0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080818
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '16 at 14:54
Run Duration	497 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD AthlonX2 DualCore QL-60 22 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 17.9 2-Core 43.5 32% 43 Pts	4-Core 42.3 8-Core 44.3 6% 43.3 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 30E4) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.1000 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.96 0% 0.64 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingrich K9 60GB SATA3 SSD 17 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.095.14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 836 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1095 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 131073 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AD) Unknown 1 1 4302176346 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 128 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C2) HDA temperature 75 75 257700003865 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4531810464 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5389605187	14.6% Very poor	Read 193 Write 36.7 Mixed 31.3 19% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.15 4K Write 6.09 4K Mixed 0.16 17% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 46%
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 167GB free Firmware: LV010J Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1678 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3092 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 174 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 20511 (0A) Spinup retry count 161 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2433 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 811748819058 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 278011 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 257698562073 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 162 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8289 (DE) Loaded hours 61 61 15694 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 326 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	26.5% Poor	Read 45.1 Write 47.1 Mixed 20.6 28% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.26 67% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 31%
Generic Flash Disk 134GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 125GB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Read 14 Write 3.11 Mixed 4.16 7% 7.11 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 5% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 0 3% 1 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6735s Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP Compaq 6735s

CPU
TurionX2 Dual Core Mobile RM-72AMDBench 33%, 26 samples	2x
TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82AMDBench 35%, 30 samples	1x
Sempron SI-42AMDBench 27%, 500 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	6x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq 6735s

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP Compaq 6735s

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)