Toshiba QOSMIO F750

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba QOSMIO F750 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110806
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '16 at 18:56
Run Duration	93 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 155 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 379 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 0010) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2353 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 169 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 459 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5550 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 50 214749151265 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7088721066 (F7) Unknown 100 100 222008485 (F8) Unknown 100 100 115134147	53.4% Above average	Read 448 Write 221 Mixed 316 72% 328 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 12.4 68% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 12.9 18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.5 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QOSMIO F750 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO F750

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	25x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	8x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	3x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	22x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	15x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	24x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16