Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-E (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '16 at 21:51
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1820-$56 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 88.5 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 159 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 156 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1.8GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.72% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 4 Parallax 3.22 2% 3.44 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.26 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 100 253 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 6 (C2) HDA temperature 105 103 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	99.6% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 178 Mixed 166 129% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.88 4K Mixed 0.37 148% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 543GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 166 2533 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1709 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2423 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1709 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 75 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1635 (C2) HDA temperature 102 98 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71% Very good	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 116 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.32 92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 284GB free Firmware: 0-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 71 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7616 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10612 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6771 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4563 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 146748 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4143907 (BC) Unknown 91 91 947 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 36 (C2) HDA temperature 121 109 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 146748 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 89 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 45 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	36.3% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 65.8 Mixed 66.9 49% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.31 81% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 2x2GB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.6 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	222x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	175x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	143x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	207x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	108x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	100x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	95x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $548

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16