MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151102
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '16 at 20:34
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 236 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 689 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 921 57% 921 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6598 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 343 (B1) Unknown 97 97 49 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 47 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 187 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15798193091	108% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 412 Mixed 420 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 40 161% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 24.3 94% 210 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
OCZ INTREPID 3700 480GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 97GB free Firmware: 1.5.1.0A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3305 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 199 (64) Unknown 100 100 636480 (AB) Unknown 80 0 5465 (AE) Unknown 61 100 122 (B8) Unknown 19 100 1319 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 62 4069937 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1854 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1670 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 1854535725 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 4 100 122 (D0) Spin buzz 0 100 4 (D2) Unknown 100 100 9 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 36 (D5) Unknown 100 100 18 (D6) Unknown 100 100 18 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 800 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 0 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 0 100 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2029 (FB) Unknown 100 100 9638	95.5% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 358 Mixed 396 89% 399 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 29.1 143% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 89.8 125% 230 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 103%
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 45GB free Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5796 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 324 (AB) Unknown 100 100 80870224 (AE) Unknown 100 100 147 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 9 (D2) Unknown 100 100 18 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 798 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1120 (F9) Unknown 100 100 43251148	103% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 495 Mixed 502 113% 504 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 23.3 125% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 84.1 133% 253 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 22GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15454 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 569 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2486 (EB) Unknown 99 99 477 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10273649315	91.7% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 349 Mixed 358 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 24.1 126% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 80.6 118% 223 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 113424984 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 232 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4300004554 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5206 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 234 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 41 447298666523 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 19645 (C2) HDA temperature 27 59 77309411355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -2461016259439 (F1) Unknown 100 253 33503274043 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1726228344	98.3% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 168 Mixed 163 127% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.29 76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR 4x8GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 39.3 116% 40.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 20.9 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	397x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	244x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16