| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-E WS (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20141127 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 06 '16 at 18:05 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | BGD-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
73.1%
Very good
|
68% 113 Pts
|
50% 409 Pts
|
38% 617 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6256
|
22.2%
Poor
|
21% 28.7 fps
|
24% 30.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66%
Good
|
63% 284 MB/s
|
102% 36.1 MB/s
|
99% 155 MB/s
|
|
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
101% 135 MB/s
|
217% 2.28 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.3%
Good
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
58% 69.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 42x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 35x |
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 15x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $1,158 |