ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion FT915AA-AR6 g3635d

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion FT915AA-AR6 g3635d (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Boston
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '16 at 16:22
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 43.1 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 88.2 35% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 90.1 8-Core 89.8 12% 89.9 Pts	64-Core 84.6 5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7730 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E245) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.69 1% 1.15 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 9.77 Splatting 14.9 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 23 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 86 (A5) Unknown 100 100 42957602859 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 39 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 25 322122547251 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 60130590736 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 550 (EA) Unknown 100 100 756 (F1) Unknown 253 253 656 (F2) Unknown 253 253 182 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	33% Below average	Read 239 Write 111 Mixed 169 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 4.02 51% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 82.6 DQ Mixed 3.92 17% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 29 Write 3.77 Mixed 6.85 12% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.77 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 1.02 95% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback