Asus H97-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '16 at 20:59
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 183 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 359 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 35.4 Parallax 31.8 31% 35 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 33.9 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7040 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1367 (B1) Unknown 96 96 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 48 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8594002077	86.3% Excellent	Read 487 Write 333 Mixed 245 78% 355 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 21.3 126% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 54.9 85% 162 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 486GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 172 2316 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1422 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7115 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1352 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1407 (C2) HDA temperature 106 95 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	87.7% Excellent	Read 159 Write 147 Mixed 120 106% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.27 98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0740 750GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 136GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 60.2 Write 69.8 Mixed 51 78% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.13 54% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 35%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 44GB free, PID 1000, SAMSUNG 64GB Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.41% Terrible	Read 37.1 Write 4.78 Mixed 29.1 26% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.94 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.58 57% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 9.41% Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 37GB free, PID 1666, KINGSTON 128D Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 41.5 Write 8.3 Mixed 9.98 19% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.95 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.87 69% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 12.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.6 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PRO Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	169x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	103x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	65x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	44x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16