Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '16 at 07:25
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 25.5 GHz, turbo 25.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 703 72% 582 Pts	64-Core 914 56% 914 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.9 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.7% Very good	Lighting 86.9 Reflection 91.5 Parallax 73.8 71% 84.1 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 104 Splatting 92 79% 97.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5432 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2211 (B1) Unknown 94 94 117 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 43 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 987 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36607626695
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Asrock RAM Disk 14GB 6GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 564 Write 313 Mixed 190 262% 356 MB/s	4K Read 2.28 4K Write 3.62 4K Mixed 0.36 202% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 293%
Toshiba MQ01ABC150 1.5TB 653 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 0GB free Firmware: AQ001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3441 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9829 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 11539 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3993 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 811 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 118124 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249108693034 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 223 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 91 91 3870 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 2 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 254 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	44.8% Average	Read 85.2 Write 71.2 Mixed 77.1 59% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.13 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.11 22% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 62%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5583, ultra fit sata3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 140 Write 37 Mixed 48.8 77% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.89 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.57 84% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 43.4 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 35.7 106% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 22.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	49x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	5x
HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 2,054 samples	4x
GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 73%, 520 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16