Asus M51BC

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '16 at 13:47
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 57.1 2-Core 109 54% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 359 34% 284 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 0493) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 42.6 27% 35.2 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 27.4 Splatting 33.2 24% 28.8 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37128G 128GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11105535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 89842125902464 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 880 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 632 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 66 81608704039 (C2) HDA temperature 39 66 81608704039 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11105535 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11105535 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11105535 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11088 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4159 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4159 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5769	49.4% Average	Read 442 Write 96.5 Mixed 145 49% 228 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 16.2 72% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 37.6 44% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 265GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 67 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896895158 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1167 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4667 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 885 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1181 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1181 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 197569740838 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.7% Good	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 116 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.16 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	97x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	12x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16