Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130703
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '16 at 18:12
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 213 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 427 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PowerColor(148C 2372) CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.7 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 85.1 55% 74.1 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 57.1 52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300 2,857 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 141GB free Firmware: X211T0RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 2140 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 699 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 113 (A8) Unknown 100 100 50 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2582 (AB) Unknown 100 100 10 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 33 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 9 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 39 167504904222 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 10 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3635 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2470 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2801 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	106% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 471 Mixed 443 106% 473 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 29.6 142% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 65.9 121% 241 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6109 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2637 (B1) Unknown 95 95 160 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 163 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20918549462	70.9% Very good	Read 498 Write 234 Mixed 356 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 21.7 95% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 60.5 76% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 846GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 70 69 9293 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7345 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7717 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3800 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 15 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 46 231929085982 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 13 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7379	76.8% Very good	Read 130 Write 138 Mixed 136 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.62 138% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 7,771 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16