Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall percentile is the average of the percentiles for each component in the PC. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '16 at 01:13
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A6-3650 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.1% Below average
SC Int 66.3
SC Float 40.8
SC Mixed 50.3
42% 52.5 Pts
QC Int 258
QC Float 161
QC Mixed 197
47% 205 Pts
MC Int 256
MC Float 160
MC Mixed 197
31% 204 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$174
MaxC: 1010 MHz, MaxM: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 142
Reflection 136
Parallax 179
48% 152 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 124
Splatting 90.5
77% 106 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 240GB-$90
4GB free
Firmware: CS221016 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61% Good
Read 393
Write 295
Mixed 198
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 11.9
86% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 13.9
24% 44 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MK5061GSY 500GB-$79
16GB free
Firmware: MC000D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 61.6
Mixed 32.2
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 55%
Patriot Supersonic Xpress USB 3.0 32GB-$22
16GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 77.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.4
43% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
42% 3.59 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB-$66
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $346Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Pentium G4560 $71AMD RX 480 $175Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $124
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $570SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $123SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback