Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 0 old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '16 at 01:13
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A6-3650 APU
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.5% Below average
SC Int 66.3
SC Float 40.8
SC Mixed 50.3
42% 52.5 Pts
QC Int 258
QC Float 161
QC Mixed 197
47% 205 Pts
MC Int 256
MC Float 160
MC Mixed 197
31% 204 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$210
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 142
Reflection 136
Parallax 179
47% 152 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 124
Splatting 90.5
53% 106 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 240GB-$103
4GB free
Firmware: CS221016 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61% Good
Read 393
Write 295
Mixed 198
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 11.9
86% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 13.9
24% 44 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MK5061GSY 500GB-$60
16GB free
Firmware: MC000D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 61.6
Mixed 32.2
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 55%
Patriot Supersonic Xpress USB 3.0 32GB-$22
16GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 77.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.4
43% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.02
42% 3.59 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB-$62
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $291AMD RX 480 $379Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $33Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $23
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $40HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback