Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '16 at 18:00
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 653 58% 491 Pts	64-Core 1,671 103% 1,671 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 375.86 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 20 15% 22.2 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 23.6 19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,437 Write 1,612 Mixed 1,516 341% 1,522 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 25.9 124% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 85.7 50% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 194%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2213 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 679 (B1) Unknown 94 94 338 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 105 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10002563085
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 465GB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 77.6 Write 76.2 Mixed 68.5 56% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.19 48% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WILK WILK Samsung M393B5170EH1- Samsung M393B5170EH1- WILK WILK Samsung M393B5170EH1- Samsung M393B5170EH1- 32GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 30.6 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16