HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1966
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 19 '16 at 00:03
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 40.2
29% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 287
20% 185 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1966) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 3.59
2% 4.57 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 460
Write 312
Mixed 356
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 7.95
43% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 97.3
DQ Mixed 48.7
40% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
686GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76.8
Write 78.8
Mixed 78.6
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 57%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB
120GB free, PID 1000, pny
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 67
Write 32.6
Mixed 39.5
53% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.39
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.47
52% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
30GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 9.25
Mixed 11.5
16% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 1.3
113% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback