User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 18:09
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 271
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 897
88% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 198
Parallax 180
146% 186 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 171
Splatting 125
114% 141 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 128%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
32GB free
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 519
Write 355
Mixed 357
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 10.5
101% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 10.1
80% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback