EPoX nForce4 DDR2: MF4-J3, MF4-J3/G, AF4-J3, AF4-J Series

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	NVIDIA AWRDACPI
Motherboard	EPoX nForce4 DDR2: MF4-J3, MF4-J3/G, AF4-J3, AF4-J Series (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060824
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '16 at 22:15
Run Duration	424 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 65.4 40% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 68.4 8-Core 73.9 9% 71.2 Pts	64-Core 80.8 5% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 847B) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.16 2% 2.16 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 2 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 122981828 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -65231963271643 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 351 (AB) Unknown 0 0 2 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 226 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 2 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 41 49 1017910460457 (C2) HDA temperature 41 49 1017910460457 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 122981828 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 122981828 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 122981828 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 92 92 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 20300 (EA) Unknown 0 0 18889 (F1) Unknown 0 0 18889 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3360	27.2% Poor	Read 113 Write 62.1 Mixed 87.2 19% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 10.4 58% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 10.7 17% 32 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 69%
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB 1,569 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 612 (03) Spinup time 134 132 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5961 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 27810 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1625 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 237 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5961 (C2) HDA temperature 99 85 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 11	46% Average	Read 73 Write 86.9 Mixed 25 45% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.46 112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 19GB free Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 70 61 205023346 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 60 60 41601 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 722539284 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4716 (C2) HDA temperature 46 58 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 70 61 205023346 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.7% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 53.5 Mixed 30 34% 45.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.25 77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 30%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 1a00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 3.4 Mixed 4.33 6% 6.04 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 18% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16