Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 03 '17 at 06:52
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 428
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2773) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 36
Parallax 47.7
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 33.3
34% 43.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 498
Write 237
Mixed 309
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 17.1
112% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 17.3
45% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 110%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 140
Mixed 125
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.2
105% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
926GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 99.3
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
398GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 77.4
Write 79.8
Mixed 80.7
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.53
110% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 70%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 77.9
Mixed 77.3
112% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.92
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.07
22% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback