Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 04 '17 at 09:27
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 717
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.09 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.6
38% 43.2 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41
Splatting 36.1
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 500
Write 350
Mixed 410
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 23.8
114% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 25.2
83% 181 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 124%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
5GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 196
Write 121
Mixed 148
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 9.4
80% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 9
38% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 167
Mixed 102
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
225GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 59
Mixed 62.5
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.11
60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
137GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 51.1
Write 53.1
Mixed 55.8
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.15
67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback