Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	13.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '17 at 06:33
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 130 57% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 404 40% 325 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Lighting 30.9 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 35.4 25% 31.3 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 31.8 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 648GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 227 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 54 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2698192241	85.5% Excellent	Read 487 Write 376 Mixed 405 94% 423 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 33.4 122% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 56.8 60% 100 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 133%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 183 Write 195 Mixed 550 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 19.5 99% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 19 30% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 769GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 89 4342488 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3786 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 196058138 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25483 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 200 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 150 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 82 59 571408402 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 87 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 304163 (C2) HDA temperature 18 41 51539607570 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -31988916408380 (F1) Unknown 100 253 27126954096 (F2) Unknown 100 253 34883494072	104% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 185 Mixed 174 135% 179 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.35 116% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 470GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 224989640 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 86 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 4645112467 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11684 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 83 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032839 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 81 55 621871123 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 42 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1639 (C2) HDA temperature 19 45 73014444051 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -83150566838916 (F1) Unknown 100 253 49288789260 (F2) Unknown 100 253 487464046075	80.2% Excellent	Read 114 Write 165 Mixed 125 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 5.41 4K Mixed 0.45 169% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 28GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 102 Write 97.7 Mixed 75 115% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.21 68% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 24,592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16