| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-C D3/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160420 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 14 '17 at 06:29 |
| Run Duration | 281 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
71% 127 Pts
|
48% 359 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.33
|
55.2%
Above average
|
55% 64.6 fps
|
55% 67.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
97% 435 MB/s
|
140% 50.1 MB/s
|
56% 108 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
12GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.97%
Terrible
|
11% 11 MB/s
|
68% 2.05 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
32.6%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
40% 99.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-C D3/BR Builds (Compare 62 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-C D3/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $104 |