Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '17 at 12:15
Run Duration	395 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 74 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 379 43% 334 Pts	64-Core 379 23% 379 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58% Above average	Lighting 71.7 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 61.7 58% 68.4 fps	MRender 72.1 Gravity 69 Splatting 68.8 57% 70 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (64) Unknown 100 100 104384 (65) Unknown 100 100 71040 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 30 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1165 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 100 167505231907 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 172 (EA) Unknown 100 100 160 (F1) Unknown 100 100 165 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	35.1% Below average	Read 223 Write 127 Mixed 89.4 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 8.31 59% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 39.1 DQ Mixed 7.82 13% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 88%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 82 82 6130 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 5661 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2129 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2670 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 69 64 522125343 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 150725 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	59.1% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 108 Mixed 95.7 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 59%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 3300 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 2734 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8877 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2712 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 538968096 (C2) HDA temperature 68 60 538902560 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 70023 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 21 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	64.9% Good	Read 111 Write 114 Mixed 43.2 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.44 120% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 62%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 247GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 82 82 6250 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6193 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3338 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2673 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 69 63 522125343 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 257605 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	45.1% Average	Read 80 Write 77.1 Mixed 76.7 59% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.36 90% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 59%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	4.43% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 3.17 Mixed 4.66 8% 8.74 MB/s	4K Read 4.49 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.007 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.43% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.7% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.1 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	505x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	224x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	138x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16