Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M LX (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '17 at 13:34
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$196 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 151 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 212 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing below potential (84^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 73 Parallax 67 58% 70.4 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 71.1 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 240GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 86GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 468 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 48 (64) Unknown 100 100 263136 (65) Unknown 100 100 117312 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 77 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1332 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 163210068001 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 491 (EA) Unknown 100 100 440 (F1) Unknown 100 100 450 (F2) Unknown 100 100 927 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	45.4% Average	Read 214 Write 216 Mixed 176 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 14.4 72% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 69.7 DQ Mixed 10.3 19% 36 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 6 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2124 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (64) Unknown 100 100 2395424 (65) Unknown 100 100 465312 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 41 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 719 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1370 (B7) Unknown 99 99 10 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 100 163209674786 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 6 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4398 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2469 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3545 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6193 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 6	31.2% Below average	Read 196 Write 120 Mixed 84.9 29% 134 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 5.94 51% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 42.3 DQ Mixed 5.01 12% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 164GB free Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9847 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 661167440 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24015 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4103 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4728 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 889847845 (C2) HDA temperature 37 53 42949672997 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 73 51 172762868 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	55% Above average	Read 93.1 Write 98.5 Mixed 30.2 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.45 100% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 150GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 96 89 164479416 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13150 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 613952351 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20720 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3952 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1864 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 47 656539687 (C2) HDA temperature 39 53 47244640295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 46 104667953 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	52% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 91.2 Mixed 23.5 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB 424 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	34x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	22x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GBWDCBench 46%, 14,337 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x
99P5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 49%, 18 samples	6x
9905471-006.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 40%, 25 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16